Some people believe that corporal punishment will spoil the children while others believe that it is the best method of teaching discipline to children. Do you agree or disagree?
People have different views about the effectiveness of physical punishment. While it is widely perceived that it is the best parenting method to regulate children’s behaviors, others are of the opinion that corporal punishment would do more harm than good. Personally, I fully support the latter position.
There are numerous reasons why parents see penalties such as blows or slaps as efficient way to educate their offspring, one of which is the achievement of children’s immediate compliance. It is true that being scared of smacking, children would try to avoid misbehaving when they are staying with those punishing them. Another justification is corporal punishment might act as a deterrent for the prospective misconducts among children, warning them of potential consequences if they attempt to breach schools’ or parents’ code of conduct. There is no denying that children, especially those in their puberty, are often temporary sociopaths, and they find it unnecessary to listen to or follow the grownups’ explanation and guidance. For this reason, physical punishment could turn their impulsive, thoughtless behaviors into more controlled, purposeful ones.
The shortcomings of corporal punishment, however, are indisputable. First and foremost, parents often hit their offspring to relieve frustration when they find their kids’ behaviors exasperating. The fundamental goal of their act is to correct children’s misconducts, but it may leave irreparable physical pain on them if an unbridled use of smacking or slapping is applied. Parents, when being in anger, barely notice the severity of their acts, which could in turn subject their children to trauma. It should also be noted that long-lasting mental disorders may arise as the kids are occasionally exposed to physical punishment. It is possible that turbulent upbringing would provoke children’s resentment and self-isolation, thereby wrecking their self-esteem. They may also regard violence and force as a way of showcasing power over other people and gradually lose their empathy with others’ suffering. Corporal punishment would therefore prove to be counterproductive when it comes to kids’ nurturing.
In sum, for the reasons mentioned above, I would contend that physical punishment is not an optimal disciplinary method to educate children. My own view is verb explanation would be more efficient in helping children distinguish the boundaries between acceptable and unacceptable manners.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en acceptable and unacceptable manners.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73315363881 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21157870267 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587601078167 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.86027691 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.166666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6111111111 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192679132047 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631303031267 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594557900145 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14009472045 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508146050285 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.