Water resources around the world are falling deficient. Analyze the possible reasons and provide your suggestions.
In this day and age, water depletion is considered one of the most critical issues facing global citizens. This could be attributed to a multiple of factors, but several approaches could be adopted to tackle the problem.
There are numerous reasons why water is becoming exhausted, one of which is the misuse of water in daily activities such as washing or cooking. Believing that water is a non-finite resource, many people consume it in an uncontrolled and irresponsible manner. For example, they may leave their tap running even though water is not needed. Additionally, a great amount of water has been wasted during manufacturing process or farming practices. To be more specific, water sprayed in the fields evaporates before they reach the roots, which is seen as an unsustainable irrigating method. Another justification is that water is severely contaminated due to the untreated sewerage discharged into the water bodies by factories, which largely contributes to water scarcity.
Despite the above-mentioned reasons, policy makers can take steps to mitigate its deleterious repercussions. One possible solution would be encouraging the inhabitants to recycle water so that it does not go to waste. For instance, water which has been used for washing can be used to flush the toilet. Besides, people need to be informed about the value of water and the importance of saving it. This could be achieved by educational programs incorporated in curriculum or TV shows. In agriculture sector, the authorities could introduce innovative practices such as drip irrigation so that farmers can manage water properly. A more viable step could be heavy fines imposed on those who cause harm to the environment, especially those who dump garbage or pump effluent to the reservoirs. In doing so, people will be more responsible for preserving water reserves.
In sum, it is evident that water crisis is caused by numerous reasons, but effective governance plays a pivotal role in grappling with the phenomenon.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, so, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27102803738 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01892144735 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610591900312 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2099917017 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5294117647 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58823529412 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12220320606 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428359732425 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333457530201 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0672583668665 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421805547732 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.