Water resources around the world are falling deficient. Analyze the possible reasons and provide your suggestions.
There is a widespread belief that people all around the globe are facing severe water scarcity. This problem is caused by a range of factors, but several measures could be taken to deal with it.
There are numerous reasons for water crisis facing global citizens, one of which is the demographic shifts. As population grows, the demands for water consumption also accelerate, which would in turn place great pressure on the water resources. What is more, in order to feed an estimated 9 billion people by 2050, mass production and farming practices are on the rise, leading higher needs for water supply. For example, more water is needed for irrigating and manufacturing purposes. Yet, this natural resource is finite, so it may run out if not managed properly. At the same time, chemical substances including fertilizers and pesticides are aggressively applied to yield productivity, thereby intensifying the already serious water pollution. In the long run, these toxic chemicals can permeate into underground aquifers and make water unavailable and unable to be consumed.
Despite the justifications mentioned above, various approaches might be adopted to tackle water exhaustion. One possible step would be for the government to produce some documentary movies about challenges of life without sufficient water supply that people in many parts of the world encounter. This could raise people’s awareness of using water effectively. Another action that policy makers could do is to encourage farmers to produce organic food as this can not only improve people’s health but also mitigate impacts on water resources. A heavier fine imposed on those who cause harm to the environment and water reserves might also be efficient, making people more responsible for their water consumption.
In sum, for the reasons mentioned above, it is indisputable that water depletion is the consequence of combined factors. However, the authorities could come up with different solutions to grapple with it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, for example, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3821656051 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85758068546 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636942675159 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1847296868 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.625 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155837257937 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053700239638 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313885237357 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878231097164 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249554862576 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.