In recent years, different organizations are coming up with the concept of having their own distinguishable dress code. While some people consider it is not a necessary thing to focus on, I would contend that undoubtedly it has multifarious benefits at an internal level as well as to the external world.
To begin with, uniform helps to unify the employee of any given organization. This means it represents that all within that operations are under the same umbrella and from C-level executive to the front desk receptionist exhibits the uniqueness despite their different roles at different positions. Thus, it develops a core brand image of that company in the external world with more professional attire. An empirical survey conducted in the USA by the Boston Consultant Group last year ascertained the same notion. The survey reported that 95% of the organizations who were having their identical business attire, considered to be 100% professional company by their customers, suppliers and other stakeholders. Another point is that uniforms serve as a better identification tool for sales-based ventures where customer service is a pivotal part of generating business leads. Therefore, for the customers, it is easily noticeable who are there to serve them on the other side of the counter.
Furthermore, some people feel that there is no meaning in having the same dress unless the actual service is of premium quality. To them, companies should emphasize on improving their customer experience rather than becoming like the school-going kids with the same colored shirt, pants and tie with the suit. However, they should not forget that integrity is itself a part of representing quality. That is why we see the cabin crew of Emirates and other airlines with their identifiable dress patterns that even matches with the logo color of the company. This exemplifies that the obvious benefits are there for the companies operating globally.
To recapitulate, wearing a specific dress on duty emits the sense of professionalism and responsibility which ultimately helps to build the core of the quality concept. To me, for any company it helps to gain attention and focus to their potential internal and external customers without any hazard, hence, should be considered as a mandatory part of the job.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24797843666 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95735609236 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9110635501 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.6875 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1875 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25293326751 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733285545161 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054597048194 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14007351189 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419863529476 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.