Many sports fans are immersed in supporting their favorite teams and ends up seeing a lot of advertisements on uniforms, television or social media. While some people feel that there are several merits of companies sponsoring the sports, others argue that there are several drawbacks with this. Although I feel that there are more disadvantages than advantages associated with this, still I will discuss in detail on both views in this essay.
There are several advantages on companies sponsoring sports of which I will be discussing the most crucial ones. First of all, players would get access to many of the expensive sports equipments, which unless sponsored will not be affordable for them. In cricket, for example, batsmen require bowling machines during net practice to upscale their batting skills. As these machines are costlier, they can be bought only if any multinational companies sponsor them. Similarly, sportsmen need to spend quite a lot of money for participating in tournaments. If they had to fund for themselves, they would be distracted with these financial worries; however, with companies’ investments, players can focus completely on their game.
On the contrary, advertising through sports have adverse effects on the society. The primary disadvantage is that many of the harmful products are promoted through this means. Beer companies such as Kingfisher, promote alcoholic beverages through the games. Even though they are noxious to humans, repeated advertising subtly persuade people to buy them. Another disadvantage is that the companies’ reputation would be solely dependent on the player’s performances. When MRF sponsored cricketer Mohammad Kaif, who failed to perform well in the one day tournaments, the company’s reputation was adversely affected.
In conclusion, although there are many benefits such as access to better sports facilities and lack of financial worries for the players on companies sponsoring the sports, still the disadvantages of promoting harmful products and association of company’s reputation with the players’ performance outweigh the advantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, similarly, so, still, well, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63551401869 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01871570065 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573208722741 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0678050656 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0625 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212862374944 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07075700833 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569459835161 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137669327514 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658727081301 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.