In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move out of the cities and into regional areas. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, the national leaders in some parts of the world encourage entrepreneurs to transfer their companies out of urban areas. Despite some obvious drawback of this trend, I would argue that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
On the one hand, moving the industries and companies out of the cities have a detrimental effect on the national economy. Clearly, the governments have to allocate the resources of the national budget to support the companies, which would transfer their businesses out of the urban areas — for instance, improving the local infrastructure such as traffic system, education system, and other necessary utilities. It might inevitably lead to a burden on the treasury of countries. Besides, companies might be facing several challenging to transfer their businesses, which means not only reconstructing the industries areas, head office, and facilities but also hiring the new employees. It costs too much money for them.
On the other hand, there are undoubtedly several benefits that governments should consider. The first reason for this view is that help to curb the metropolis traffic congestion. When the companies moving out of the cities, the number of vehicles enter the city centers would certainly reduce and as a result, the traffic problems are tackled. The other benefit is that improving the environment of modern cities such as air, water, and land. For instance, the atmosphere is fresher because the industries no longer discharging the emission into the air. Finally, the companies would bring more jobs for people and the massive boost for the local workforce.
In conclusion, although there are several costs for the business moving from the urban areas to regional areas. It seems to me that the advantages of this tendency are more significant than the disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, if, so, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35640138408 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8723391603 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539792387543 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2741277643 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234683486016 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701173975959 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534809476558 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144465819206 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343966653345 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.