The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table illustrates the number of jungle by millions of hectares in various areas on Earth over a period of 15 years.
Overall, It is clear that Asia and Europe experienced upward trends while others witnessed downward trends in the number of forested land between 1990 and 2005.
The number of jungle in each region differed significantly. In 1990, The region with the biggest forestland was Europe. About 989 millions hectares in the number of jungle and increased significantly to reach a peak of 1001 millions in 2005. Similarly, there was a slight rise in the number of forestland in Asia over the same period. On the other hand, the least number of jungle was in Oceania, with 199 millions of hectares. This number has dropped slightly to 197 millions in 2005.
In Africa and South America areas, there was a sharp fall in the number of forestland from 1990 to 2005 while the number of jungle in North America was declined from 1990 and 2000. This number remain stayed between 2000 and 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | Shivam7090 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | Spring2019 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | hung253 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | lyvvu | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Anbill | 56 | view |
- The charts below show agricultural production in two different regions of the country 77
- The bar graph illustrates the proportion of Americans ate in fast food establishments over a period of ten years from 2003 to 2013. 61
- The bar chart illustrates the frequency with which Americans ate in fast food establishments from 2003 to 2013 58
- In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should beoffered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary educationto those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 78
- In some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars Why is this the case Which development do you think is better 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table illustrates the number of jungle by millions of hectares in variou...
^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '199 million'.
Suggestion: 199 million
...t number of jungle was in Oceania, with 199 millions of hectares. This number has dropped sligh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76436781609 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45453438909 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4391528463 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0834096258074 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441398729474 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038081788631 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0577691448897 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299687701703 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.