In some countries it is now illegal to reject someone applying for a job because of his or her age.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Experts throughout the developing and developed world have debated whether it should be illegal to stop one from applying specific job based on his age. When some countries are now enforcing regulation deterring age discrimination, it is becoming increasingly recognised by the public on its benefits. This essay will assert that such legislation on ensuring citizen would not be rejected regarding his age is a positive development.
To begin with, instead of age, individual merits should be the key for judging one's productivity. The central reason behind this is twofold, firstly there is no direct connection between age and working performance. In fact, by reading the job description, candidates are often checked against the required abilities, qualifications and work experience. Secondly, today's technology can narrow the disparity between juniors and seniors. For instance, a senior programmer can enroll an online course for mastering the cutting-edge technology, while the use of the Internet pave the way for the juniors to acquire their necessary qualifications. Consistent in this line of thinking is that there would be no intrinsic distinction among various age groups if employees are willing to devote themselves on pursuing a career.
Another factor that cannot be ignored is the necessity for incorporating both juniors and seniors in a working environment. This is largely because the contributions from each of them are irreplaceable. Compared to those who have just entered a company, seniors can share their working experience based on their own sophistication, which in turn, to a considerable extent, unwind themselves from heavy workload. Furthermore, instead of getting weary of repetitive work, senior officer can often be inspired by the young blood, resulting in an increase in overall productivity.
In conclusion, given the latest development of our society, prohibiting employers from rejecting job application based on applicant's age is a positive development. It is predicted that the government will provide more training on further education in the foreseeable future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...al merits should be the key for judging ones productivity. The central reason behind...
^^^^
Line 5, column 578, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in an increase in overall productivity. In conclusion, given the latest developm...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61875 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22194016665 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63125 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7862518598 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.866666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248623170197 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725093689301 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632622529285 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147040260582 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974227227765 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.