People should only be selected for job on the basis of their talent and never on the basis of age. Selecting people on the basis of talent and on the basis of their tendency to work hard will eventually lead to the growth of the organisation or company the person is working with.
To begin with, we generally see advertisements where person qualifications, experience and age. But however, if we look carefully at the two sides of the same coin, we find that on one hand young talent is enthusiastic and computer friendly add on the other hand senior persons are more experienced. The experience can very often help to complete the task before the required time period. No matter the person is too young or little aged, anyone can have an exceptional outstanding apptitude which should indeed be the key factor for their selection.
Likewise, if we take an example in this context, a senior scientist will probably have more experience to solve a problem in comparison to a fresh researcher. Similarly, an experienced doctor or a teacher will have better experience to treat or teach respectively. So if there is an open position, we can have better person being selected if there is a wide age lmit.
Taking the cognizance of the fact that there is also a tem called "Destiny", it is possible that a person who has a higher age might have been through struggle or might have experienced some family issues due to which he or she was not able to take up job and is jobless. Under such conditions, if there is an age limit for a certain job, that person will not be able to apply even if he or she fulfills all the job requirements. Under such circumstances, the authority will have to compromise for the selction.
Thus, hammering upon the nail, I pen down saying that the only criteria for job selction should be "talent".
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 97, Rule ID: BUT_NEVERTHELESS[1]
Message: Use simply 'But'.
Suggestion: But
...son qualifications, experience and age. But however, if we look carefully at the two sides ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, look, similarly, so, thus, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70679012346 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96078076792 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54012345679 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2665408049 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.307692308 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0966736552183 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382300647486 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038686057422 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0542402431819 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318541018142 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.