In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people.
Why is this the case?
Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?
It is undeniable that in some nations, citizens tend to prefer to have their own house rather than rent a place. This essay will delve into a fundamental reason for this preference and why I believe that the circumstance is perhaps pessimistic.
A primary stance for many people to own a house instead of a renting accommodation is capacious spaces. Obviously, people who live in a house have a chance to own how many rooms or floors they wish. Whereas, if people decide to have a rent in an apartment, for instance, they will probably not have this advantage because most of these buildings will have limited areas for each household. Also, the owners are unable to have storeys when living in the apartment. Thus, it could be a challenge for somebody to pick the most suitable flat for themselves in case they are fastidious.
Furthermore, the situation of preferring an own-purchased house to a renting place is not so positive. Due to the boom of overpopulation, more and more individuals need lands to live. If many people wanted to own a house, it would take more spaces to do so, which could lead to the fact that there would be little areas for other buildings while the price of purchasing a land could be so high. As a result, some dwellers may not be able to afford the expense of buying their own houses or renting a flat room because there are not many apartments. Thus, they probably end up staying on street, possibly increasing the rate of indigence or crime.
To conclude, having a great deal of spaces at home becomes the main reason to host a personal house instead of a renting one. I believe that this propensity in society could cause some individuals not to have a shelter above their head.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-28 | huynguyen3726 | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-22 | Đặng Khánh Giang | 61 | view |
| 2021-05-25 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-21 | thao_tran9999 | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-13 | krishyparms | 56 | view |
- success is often measured by wealth and material belongings Do you think wealth is the best measure of success What makes a successful person 89
- IELTS 4 Test 1 Writing task 1 The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You sh 86
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are se 73
- In some cities there are few controls on the design and construction of homes and other buildings and owners can decide on the style of their houses Do the advantages of this outweigh the drawbacks 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as for, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65573770492 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6860724523 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537704918033 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.810011092 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.428571429 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248511458256 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832500913306 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539933440678 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15899378607 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532351059367 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as for, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65573770492 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6860724523 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537704918033 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.810011092 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.428571429 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248511458256 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832500913306 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539933440678 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15899378607 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532351059367 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.