In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?
Having a private home has become an important aspect in some countries rather than renting one. There would be several reasons contributing to this phenomenon, but freedom and respectability would stand out amongst other reasons. In my opinion, I believe that it is necessarily a positive situation to own a residence.
To begin with, freedom of decoration is the first reason why people want to possess a house. As an owner of a house, people have the rights to decorate how their places would look like. If this is the case of being a tenant, then people have choices but follow the regulations of the landlords. Secondly, another noticeable cause to this belief is getting respect from other people. Asian people believe that owning a home equals success and the others would look up to you. An illustration of this point would be my 30-year-old cousin who is not allowed to date a girl from a wealthy family just simply because he is living in a rent apartment. Hence, this would prove the importance of owning a personal property.
Although it seems that we are living in a society with materialism, I still firmly believe that owning a home has a number of positive impacts. Firstly, having your won house means no monthly payment for the landlords. This also means that we do not have to bother about late payment and extra fees if we cannot pay the rent on time. Furthermore, this would us stabilize our finance if there is an urgent need for money. As well, young generation would have goals to pursue and eventually help the economic development of the country. They would pay taxes for owning a property, and these money would be allocated to improve many different essential sectors, including education and health care.
To sum up, there are numbers of reasons to urge people to obtain their own properties in some countries. From a long-term perspective, this trend would bring more benefits; therefore, I would personally recommend owning a private house.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 585, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
...ld pay taxes for owning a property, and these money would be allocated to improve many diff...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ese money would be allocated to improve many different essential sectors, including education ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, well, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87240356083 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66828120196 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584569732938 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8627588967 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.2222222222 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7222222222 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312333807228 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969576790635 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630758673685 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19622735453 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707256091267 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.