In some countries parents arrange marriages for their children, but in others, people choose their own marriage partner. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each system?
Globally, the issue of whether marriages arranged by parents are positive or not has been debated for decades. Some people believe that arranging marriages is safer than choosing by young people, while others think it is vital to have marriage freedom. This essay will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of both systems. (52)
To begin with, compared to choosing partners, marrying someone selected by family is more secure. In most cases, senior family members will conduct a background check before they introduce the person to their children because they want the young generation to have a decent life after marriage. In contrast, it is not uncommon for younger people to fall in love with fraud and suffer emotional and financial losses. Thus, it is understandable for the older generation to find a better person who they know very well for youngsters. (84)
Conversely, strangers selected by parents are normally not the ones they like. Despite parents’ goodwill, there is a huge difference between them and their children’s preferences and standards according to partner selection. In China, for example, junior family members would be very rebellious and grow grudge if the elderly make the decision about their marriages since the spouse assigned is not suitable. Under this circumstance, new couples will not be happy. (70)
This essay has discussed whether it is better to have arranged marriages because parents will be responsible to select good partners or marry those who are chosen by people since they know what kind of people they want. On balance, this essay believes the latter argument is stronger as young people should take responsibility for their lives. Around the world, societies will become much happier when all young people can choose their marriage partners. (74)
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, in contrast, kind of, in most cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24567474048 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60989126765 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615916955017 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4268681006 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.285714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330379336524 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104512409618 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787071929311 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2042811795 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693039254332 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.