In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores, and it may result in an increase in the use of cars.
Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?
In some countries, small businesses downtown are obsolete since residents switch into commuting to shopping malls on the outskirts by cars. This may lead to an increase in personal car consumption since the ability to access these malls for those who do not have a car is restricted. In my opinion, the benefits of this trend surpass the drawbacks that it has.
One positive aspect of this trend is that it can help alleviate traffic congestion in city centre. To explain, people drive to the suburbs to do shopping, which may reduce the number of vehicles travelling in the stress and release the traffic load in the city. For example, in Hanoi, one of the most populous cities in Vietnam, shopping malls such as Big C and Aeon Mall are often located in the outskirts to mitigate crowded stress in these malls’s area. Another advantage of this trend is that it is more handy for customers. In more details, out-of-town stores are normally mega malls which are often constructed in the suburbs since it offers larger space and more facilities included. Hence, people can purchase goods and use entertainment services at once. As a result, city dwellers consider choosing to go shopping in mega malls out of town is a good idea.
Despite these, some people still claim that people without personal vehicles may have difficulty in accessing these shopping centres. They may believe that using a personal vehicle to go shopping may help them gain self-reliance and prevent time consuming. To this, I would agree that they can travel by public transport. Specifically, public transport system is becoming more cutting-edge and ubiquitous. Therefore, it is ill founded to state that.
To conclude, the benefits of this trend are certainly more significant as it not only is more convenient but also helps mitigate traffic jams. Not only that, it is not a problem for those who do not own a private vehicle as many people are concerned.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, for example, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94495412844 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67670235153 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544342507645 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5174147701 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1176470588 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249819029858 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669583153756 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749137101735 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127580771651 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545015444993 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.