Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities. What are the causes? Suggest some measures to reduce traffic jams in big cities.
In some urban areas, traffic jams are happening so frequently that it is considered a huge issue. While there are several reasons for this phenomenon, some solutions can be taken to improve the situation.
One cause of this problem is that the population density in big cities is dramatically high. To explain, many people from other regions migrate to major cities for jobs and studying opportunities, which has contributed to the surge in the number of vehicles on the roads. To illustrate, in Hanoi, traffic congestion happens during peak hours due to the huge population, which is over three million citizens. Clearly, the more people move to the urban areas, the heavier the traffic load is. To alleviate this issue, the government can encourage city dwellers to relocate to the outskirts. In this way, the decline in the population may relieve the traffic jams on the streets. Hanoi is a prime example where the authorities are putting effort into relocating inhabitants to the suburbs to decrease the pressure on the traffic load. Clearly, lowering the number of residents in the metropolitan areas can help mitigate traffic congestion.
Another reason for this issue is the large number of private vehicles. Specifically, in most developed countries, city dwellers use their own vehicles to commute since they are convenient and flexible compared to public transport, which causes traffic congestion as the streets are overloaded. For instance, research shows that Hanoi has 6.7 millions of private vehicles, including 740,000 cars and 5.7 million motorbikes, while its population is about 10 million. As a result, traffic jams occur most of the time in Hanoi, especially during rush hours. Therefore, the government should have some methods to mitigate this problem, one of which is that they should levy higher tariffs on private transport to reduce traffic congestion. For example, in Hanoi, the authorities impose a 200% tax on private cars, which has helped to limit the number of private vehicle owners. Clearly, if the government levy high tariffs on cars, the residents may switch to another choice, public transport and the traffic load can be relieved.
To sum up, a large population and numerous private vehicle ownership are the two culprits behind the problem. I believe that if the solutions mentioned above are implemented effectively, the issue would be mitigated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 864, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic load. Clearly, lowering the number of residents in the metropolitan areas can ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '7 million'.
Suggestion: 7 million
...stance, research shows that Hanoi has 6.7 millions of private vehicles, including 740,000 car...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ffic load can be relieved. To sum up, a large population and numerous private ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76439866094 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5234375 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2316698338 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.105263158 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2105263158 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298746116306 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868813422071 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559518746714 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165974704663 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954326102994 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.