In some countries some criminal trials in law courts are shown on television so that the general public can watch Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages

Essay topics:

In some countries, some criminal trials in law courts are shown on television so that the general public can watch. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

In some countries, some unlawful criminals in law courts are televised in order for public to watch. While I agree that this action can exert pernicious impacts to a certain extent, I tend towards the viewpoint that the benefits far outweigh the disadvantages.
On the one hand, making criminal trials to be broadcast on television has some adverse effects. Firstly, viewers are more likely to form their own opinions related to the crime just based on their lack of understanding of the jury system. Hence, it somehow leads to their biased ideas towards a problem. Moreover, trial board stand chances of being easily influenced by the media pressure as well as the viewer’s point of view. For instance, cameras is considered as a distraction so they cannot pay all their attention to the crime, which means that it would be unjustifiable to the victims.
On the other hand, criminal trials in law courts have more significant pros than cons. The primary reason is that this leads to fear of crime among the public, which will link to a steady decline in the crime rates. Furthermore, sensational stories will attract more viewers. Finally, these programs are educational and informative, especially for youngsters who pursuit the career of lawyers and prosecutors. For example, in Vietnam, there is a program called “court sentenced” which provide a lot of useful information to viewers about not only the crimes but also the jobs related to this problem.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the benefits of unlawful criminals in prosecution outweigh their drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (2 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17441860465 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89860551774 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624031007752 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9288533263 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.692307692 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6923076923 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233792085445 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845911423434 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133960309128 0.0667982634062 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152015911419 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120364970893 0.056905535591 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.