Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do agree or disagree?

Vegetarianism has evolved as a topic of consideration among society. There exists a common belief that a vegetarian diet is an ideal and healthy eating plan for everyone. However, I give my strong opposition to the recommendation.

The primary reason is that dietary meals with solely fruit and vegetables do not guarantee an optimal eating plan for people. The most obvious reason for this view is that a balanced and sufficient dietary plan requires the intake of all six nutrition elements, which a vegetarian plan might fail to accommodate. For instance, vegetarians might not meet their intake requirements of fat, a vital element which helps cushion organs and insulate the body. Another point supporting this view is that vegetarians have a tendency to lack certain vitamins and minerals which meat-eaters rarely do. Since meat is the best source of B12, a vitamin necessary to the nervous and digestive system, vegetarians are more prone to B12 deficiency.

Another significant reason is that the decision to become a vegetarian should be made with regards to individual preferences and needs, and should not be a generic suggestion. Individuals have the full right to determine their dietary plans with taking their dietary preferences in account. For instance, a person having a predilection for meat and sweets should feel dissatisfied and upset if he or she follows a meal plan with solely fruit and vegetables. Furthermore, dietary choices should also be made with thorough consideration of individuals’ specific health status. Some children’s physical development has suffered rather than benefited from meat-deficient meals.

In conclusion, I’m of the opinion that meat-deficient diet plan is not an optimal option for everyone, and the choice of becoming a vegetarian should live up to individuals.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etarian should live up to individuals.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 965.302439024 161% => OK
No of words: 286.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44405594406 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18097468263 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 106.607317073 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583916083916 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 283.868780488 171% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6293008932 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.214285714 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21834592302 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746938479802 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548109664167 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137449832845 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015961540754 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 40.7170731707 201% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.