In some countries, students pay their college or university fees, while in some others, the government pay for them. Do you think the advantages that government pays the money outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that in some countries, rather than students, governments shoulder the responsibility of paying tuition fees to colleges or universities. This essay will compare the strengths and weakness of this phenomenon, and argue that it is more beneficial.
There is no doubt that governments affording education fees could benefit both individuals and nations. First of all, such action is beneficial to individual development. This is because without the need to worry about the tuition, students are able to put more focus on their study, which will help them develop to the capable and active person in the future. Moreover, social stability and social cohesion will be effectively enhanced as those poor students can acquire same education opportunities as the rich, thereby narrowing the gap between two social classes and creating a harmonious society. Furthermore, through allocating public funds to the education sector, a country’s national quality will be tremendously improved. For example, it is the educational expenses paid by the united government that create a such high-qualified and intelligence population in America.
Nevertheless, the negative impact of bearing the tuitions by local authorities also cannot be underestimated. To begin with, it will impose a threat to economic growth. Because there are no enough public funds to be allocated to the areas that directly stimulate the economy like manufacture sector, the speed of economic development will be slowed down and impaired. Additionally, compared with affording the cost by themselves, students who are waived from this duty may not cherish the study opportunities, which lead to the waste of educational resources.
In conclusion, although some disadvantages are associated with the action that governments paying the high education fees, I am in support of the idea that, it brings more advantages to both individuals and the whole nation.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
'will' is over used:
which will help them
social stability and social cohesion will be effectively enhanced
country’s national quality will be tremendously improved
it will impose a threat
development will be slowed down
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 297 350
No. of Characters: 1593 1500
No. of Different Words: 179 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.151 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.364 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.021 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 122 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 72 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.846 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.105 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.769 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.307 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.528 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.033 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, first of all, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51851851852 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16452822864 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612794612795 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7679044935 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.076923077 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166643112641 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555907192877 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870601679573 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124806552571 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874097039464 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.