Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this.
Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion.
These days, more and more countries have dealt with unhealthy habits of communities such as smoking in public places. It is claimed that most countries remonstrate against smoking cigarettes in places such as offices and restaurants, while others continue to legalize this activity. We will look both sides of the debate in this essay.
One the one hand, those who support of prohibiting smoking promote the idea that in terms of smoking, more and more young adults have health problems. They point to evidence from countries such as Singapore where this appears to be the case and urge nations to follow suit. Furthermore, proponents of smoking –free public places claim that governments should ban smoking as it adversely impacts not solely the environment by producing harmful fumes, but it is no denying that the youth who might have health problems. Prohibiting smoking in the public places by law, eventually would bring immediate benefits to the public, which probably turn people toward healthy lifestyle.
In contrast, opponents of smoking-free public zones are able to cite evidence from most European countries where it is accepted that smoking has no threat to communities. Obviously, there are well-organized and designated places to smoke where smokers are allowed to. Moreover, many governments have still not vetoed smoking in public spaces as it might take away some freedom of citizens.
Smoking is overall, considered as a banned activity in public places in many countries. Besides there are specified smoking zones in particular areas, in my opinion, it is imperative that people should be barred from the smoking in public places as this habit could affect the young generation life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
...ity in public places in many countries. Besides there are specified smoking zones in pa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, still, well, while, in contrast, in particular, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27472527473 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68666274227 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567765567766 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3605852987 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296928958803 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112748626115 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541655917658 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192064893063 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080698346825 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.