Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays. Does this development have more disadvantages than advantages?
It is true that in today's competitive world, some employees are expected to be readily accessible at the moment, whether they are at working days or not. While I accept that this trend may partly benefit both individuals and companies, I believe that its disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
On the one hand, continual communication between people belonging to a teamwork can bring them some benefits. In fact, the more workers concentrate on their responsibilities, the more company is able to achieve its goals to be prosperous. As a result, in a dynamic system, employees can also earn a profit. For instance, I can remember when I was Marketing Development expert at SBR Company, I was paid a premium, up to more than the salary, if I would spend extra time and energy, particularly in order to preparing the tender documents in a limited time. In addition, this subject could be beneficial for beginners earning minimum wage to learn required skill and even get a promotion sooner than expected.
However, I would argue that this habit is more likely to have harmful impacts. Firstly, it will be a living proof of invasion of privacy provided that employers expect their staff to in touch out of their working hours. All people have this right to allocate their free time on what they prefer, such as family gathering or going to vacation just to name, otherwise they may face family problems. Secondly, working overtime can lead to serious physical and mental illnesses preventing workers to enjoy their life or earning living. Finally, not having adequate entertainment, employees are prone to get exhausted and hence unproductive. Consequently, the company's efficiency will be decreased in the near future.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential drawbacks of being involved in work constantly are more significant than the possible benefits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10784313725 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93333194983 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627450980392 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0451587469 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.642857143 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289034913556 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795710592781 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466094035908 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147077599396 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367918216765 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.