Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
in the age of globalization, most schools will encourage students to study a foreign language at the early stage of life, this will help them achieve success easier in the future compared to the peers. Some experts believe that children should start learning a second language at the primary level rather than at the higher one. In my opinion, initiating new language early does bring more merits than demerits.
First of all, learning a language at primary age has some disadvantages which affect children's study of other crucial subjects including maths, science, mother tongue. At the early stage of life, it seems that those compulsory subjects are more important than a new language. Besides, studying a new subject will make students overwhelming due to the amount of workload. this is to say, children are going to be put under more pressure at this age group. for example, a child learning a second language will have to finish more homework than their fellows. This leads to a lack of spare time on which helps them to develop their physical growth.
Second, although there are some disadvantages of studying a second language, It is undeniable that studying a language besides the mother tongue does bring about more advantages for the future. At the first stages of children's development, the brain is capable of obtaining and learning quickly. Children, therefore, pick up the pronunciation without shyness and absorb faster as the brain's capacity will abate with ages. Moreover, children can study a new language in various ways namely games, televisions, outdoor activities rather than just studying with traditional methods. This will reduce the amount of stress and make them involved in lessons.
In conclusion, learning a new language is the need of the globalization process, which if started early is more effective in the young and less time-consuming to achieve excellence in it. However, an acceptable amount of workload must be considered for the comprehensive growth in all aspects.
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Governments should not have to provide care or financial support for elderly people because it is the responsibility of each person to prepare for retirement and support him or herself. 73
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 67
- the charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age group and the amount of support that receive from employers. 67
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
in the age of globalization, most schools ...
^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...whelming due to the amount of workload. this is to say, children are going to be put...
^^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... under more pressure at this age group. for example, a child learning a second lang...
^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'brains'' or 'brain's'?
Suggestion: brains'; brain's
...ithout shyness and absorb faster as the brains capacity will abate with ages. Moreover...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...eed of the globalization process, which if started early is more effective in the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19325153374 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78450740724 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542944785276 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5733068657 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8125 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307365090861 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971811941141 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838241967367 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188140074077 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941167624549 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.