Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
It is thought by some specialist about learning foreign language is that adolescent can adopt language promptly in primary school compared to high school. From my point of view, at the beginning of their study it entails huge pressure on them, which may be detrimental affect in their soft mind in long-run, because they have huge time to learn it in the future.
To commence with, progeny's brain as like as clay, so that some believe that they can obtain new language easily, as opposed to teenagers. What I mean by this is that toddlers memory is sharp and fresh in their childhood, because it is not,yet loosing it's energy. So that they can acquire or cope with foreign language, similarly, as own mother tongue. For example, in YouTube elicit quarantine videos about children who can talk 4 to 5 language, furthermore, all countries name with capital city. That means, if parents taught them different things from early childhood, their brain is coping with diversified knowledge. In addition, they also do not have pressure of public examination, co-curriculum activities, so that they spend hefty amount of time behind foreign language.
On the other hand, all offspring has not same level of talent or desire to learn new thing. In other words, parents or teacher should entangle them those activities, where they feel comfortable and complete the task with full of pleasure. This is because, if we pressurize about study, hence, consequently become arrogant, therefore, it impede them to thrive in the future naturally. More importantly, in starting of their life, they loose hope about learning, at that time, it is difficult for guardian to enrich their confidence. Regarding that matter, as for learning depend on youngster, whether they want now or in their adult age.
I am convinced about that study is all about enjoyment, otherwise potential of anyone is interrupting.
In conclusion, although early learning has some benefit, but most of the time it is creating burden or redundant pressure on child.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'toddlers'' or 'toddler's'?
Suggestion: toddlers'; toddler's
... teenagers. What I mean by this is that toddlers memory is sharp and fresh in their chil...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , yet
...sh in their childhood, because it is not,yet loosing its energy. So that they can ac...
^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r tongue. For example, in YouTube elicit quarantine videos about children who can...
^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ords, parents or teacher should entangle them those activities, where they feel c...
^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'impedes'?
Suggestion: impedes
...equently become arrogant, therefore, it impede them to thrive in the future naturally....
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 573, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to depend'
Suggestion: to depend
... Regarding that matter, as for learning depend on youngster, whether they want now or ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, may, regarding, similarly, so, therefore, as for, for example, i mean, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0960960961 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.713126379 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600600600601 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 2.10420841683 523% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3707337327 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.133333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0666666667 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169358646295 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543993697113 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068403523864 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867930887588 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730784718889 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.