Some feel that countries should produce most of the food that is eaten in their country and import as little as possible.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Global trade has always played a vital role in wellbeing of humans in all societies. Some people believe that the amount of crops imported from overseas ought to be negligible and the entire demand must be satisfied by local farmers. I strongly agree with this opinion because both local producers and a government benefit from a limited import.
Firstly, local producers suffer from food arriving from other countries that possess sufficient reserves. This means that the revenue of domestic agricultural companies drops in a presence of international competitors. Therefore, a number of citizens lose their wealth and jobs, which in its turn afflict(inflict) a damage to the economy. For example, according to the report of the University of New York, the massive import of wheat from China entailed destitution among local farmers in 2010. In other words, inner crop suppliers thrive from the regulated competition with foreign companies.
Secondly, authorities will be able to guarantee the required population's need in food consumption, if they rely on local farming. In case of an unstable political situation the number of imported crops may be significantly reduced in order to force senators to undertake unfavourable decisions. Hence, their popularity among the citizens that have election rights will diminish. For instance, the heavy dependence on Russian oat in Germany in 18th century led to the agricultural crisis and famine after the Napoleon war had broken out. Thus, a government is sensitive to foreign participation on a local market of crucial goods.
In conclusion, I truly believe that the import of food is the bane for any country due to the drawbacks for its farmers and the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'damage'.
Suggestion: damage
... jobs, which in its turn afflictinflict a damage to the economy. For example, according ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31734317343 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92829015632 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630996309963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0230438322 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.928571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127440800693 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393167750664 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435570718747 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0820347267699 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288728306508 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.