The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph provides information about how prices on fresh fruits and vegetables, sweets and carbonated drinks were changed over the period from 1978 to 2009 as well as a consumer-price index for the same interval.
Overall, it is clearly seen that the costs of all categories rose considerably. In addition, only prices on fresh fruits and vegetables increased more than consumer-price index.
At the beginning of the reported period, people should have spent about 70 per cent of the base price on sugar and sweets, and carbonated drinks. Throughout the given time interval, their figures showed a similar trend of a moderate growth to 200 and 150 per cent, respectively.
Consumer-price index, provided as reference information, rose from approximately 70 per cent in 1979 to around 220 per cent in 2009, making its change larger than the increase of sweets and drinks. In contrast, Fresh fruits and vegetables prices grew faster than all others, reaching significantly more than 300 per cent, which is almost a twice bigger change in comparison to sugar and sweets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2023-08-22 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2022-03-29 | Blackcytrus | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-07 | yanping | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | madina6369 | view |
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 76
- The government should ban smoking in all public places even though this would restrict some other people s freedoms Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer 78
- The graphs compared Japan and Malaysia in terms of five categories of average family expenses in 2010 78
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 78
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, in addition, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18181818182 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9054487143 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4287737754 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268096607737 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118775884933 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921796766669 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166282927942 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824818840492 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.