Some individuals think that working from home, while of benefit to employees, is actually a drawback to employers. To what extent, do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, working from home becomes a familiar working method because of the covid quarantine. Some people believe that this method brings many advantages to the employees, while it is the opposite to the employers. In my point of view, I partly agree with the statement.
For the employees, it is true that they gain several benefits from working from home. First of all, it gives them more time to finish their tasks. They do not need to concentrate on only one job but can organize their time and make it actually worthwhile. Working from home also reduces stress, as employees can complete their duties at the most comfortable, convenient place and flexible time. One more advantage for workers is that they face fewer distractions at home more than at the office. What’s an ideal condition to fully focus on the tasks! It truly increases their productivity a lot. However, working from home equals the lack of face-to-face contact. Direct communication is hardly required at the office so that co-workers can exchange information to work effectively.
On the other hand, working from home might be a challenge for employers. Without directly meeting up with the employees, it’s hard for the manager to catch up with the working progress, updating information, summing up data, solving problems, managing the duties of the workers... Since the employers’ duties are obviously more complicated than the employees, there are uncountable and unpredictable difficulties they must face. Nonetheless, as employers increase their productivity by working from home, managers gain benefits indirectly as well. In some specific circumstances, this working method saves an amount of money for the employers because they no longer need to pay for the companies’ facilities such as electricity, rent, etc.
In conclusion, working from home affects both sides in different ways. Companies should find solutions to solve the remaining problems of both the employees and employers as soon as possible because of the continuing pandemic quarantine.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: WORKING_PROGRESS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'work in progress'?
Suggestion: work in progress
...rd for the manager to catch up with the working progress, updating information, summing up data,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33230769231 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92808639572 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581538461538 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1593372871 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2777777778 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262158510551 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856486183691 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594506837512 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15583791468 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016987319172 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.