Some industrialized countries have serious environmental problems. The damage to the environment is an inevitable result when a country tends to improve the standard of living. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Many people argue that nations cannot raise people’s living condition without causing environmental degradation. However, I totally disagree with this view.
I believe the saying that the government focuses on achieving economic targets will inevitably result in environmental problems is just a fallacy. In fact, these serious consequences occurred due to the fact that some individuals and companies only concern their own benefits. For example, people with high incomes often buy cars, although public transport is now easily accessible and they are also aware of the danger of air pollution that car emissions cause. Another example is that Taiwan’s Formosa Corp. illegally discharged toxic chemical substances into the river without using any waste treatment systems so that they could earn higher profits. If there had not been such activities, the environment would not have been destroyed.
I am of opinion that there are several ways to make people’ lives better without the loss of the environment. Firstly, it is advisable for the government to invest heavily in alternative energy sources and make them viable for public use. As a result, citizens would have a more comfortable life while reducing the over-dependence on fossil fuel. For example, they could drive to work by electric cars which are environmentally friendly and cost-effective. Secondly, the government should impose and enforce strict laws to punish companies that have harmful practices to the environment. Those companies may have to try new technologies to recycle wastes instead of disposing of them right away and the survival of citizens would no longer be threatened.
In conclusion, I would argue that by taking feasible measures, countries could both protect the environment and make an improvement in people’s living standard.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56583629893 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03953759134 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672597864769 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3357100712 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.266666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140104697195 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042028074341 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416941045188 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890400576274 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451629542437 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.