Some parents believe that learning mathematics at school is redundant and should not be taught while others believe that it should remain a foundational subject whether or not it is used later in life.
Nowadays teaching mathematics at school is an increasingly controversial matter. Few of the parents argue that it is a waste of time learning mathematics at school while others have an opinion that it is one of the core subjects and should not be removed from the syllabus. This essay will discuss both arguments in-depth.
There are a growing number of parents who believe that mathematics should be removed from the syllabus as it is unimportant these days. They have the reason to believe that mathematics is no longer the part of life skills as it is now typically done by computers. Many children in the future barely use these skills in their job. From simple additions and subtraction to complex mathematical equations, everything has become computer operations now. Hence, these parents have a good reason to believe that studying mathematics is no longer relevant.
Another group of parents believes that mathematics should be a fundamental part of learning despite its usefulness. After all, mathematics provides people with a different conceptual way to view the world. For instance, knowing how to add, subtract, divide and do other calculations which can be done on a phone, are essential daily skills. For these reasons, there are a number of parents believe that mathematics should be the part of the curriculum.
Teaching mathematics at school is becoming a matter of debate among parents. While some of them believe it is no longer relevant, others demand it should remain as a foundational subject. This essay has discussed the various reasons why parents hold these points of view and whether mathematics should remain as a subject in school studies.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, while, after all, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17216117216 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85928819616 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1868662366 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473213096742 0.244688304435 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154741307678 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116345709977 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294305955405 0.151304729494 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834804505258 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.