Whether or not buying toys by parents has become a controversial issue in upbringing field. While toys can enhance children's intelligence and creativity and controlling their aggression, what will happen when a large number of toys to be available for children? In my opinion, although toys have a significant impact on children's nurture, limiting the number of toys is more beneficial for both the family and the child.
Undoubtedly, playing and toys are imperative for kids' mental health. Indeed, toys play a considerable role in nurturing children's, they can affect the intellectual and physical development of children and adolescents, and with applying the imagination sense help to bolster children's creativity. Furthermore, children with playing would be able to vent their rage, and this can be effective in controlling their anger. Results of a study indicate that toys can orient children to recognise their talents, and as well as helps children develop their imagination. Hence, the childhood period without the existence of toys is absurd.
While playing with toys for children is necessary, the plurality of them causes children to be distracted and leads they cannot enjoy their playing. According to researchers, too many toys disturb the children's concentration, so that they constantly leave the toys and turn to another toy that causes children cannot use them properly and act as an obstacle on thriving children's path. In plus that, buying many toys make children expected and spoiled, since they habit to have anything that they want. Therefore, the accessibility to toys must be restricted by parents to prevent children be confused and helping raise low-expectation children.
Despite many positive effects that are there in using toys for children, buying many toys might have destructive effects on children's personality. From my point of view, parents should direct their children to reinforce their mind by choosing the correct tools and limitation to use them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether or not buying toys by parents has becom...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not buying toys by parents has become a con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...their aggression, what will happen when a large number of toys to be available for children? In m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, well, while, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39423076923 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92787891386 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4664758175 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.214285714 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339225135503 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140874347333 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598593893751 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238899722517 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674909929391 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.