Owning lots of toys are most of childrens' dreams. While purchased by parents, it is argued whether so many toys brings more advantages or not to their owners. I will elaborate my point of views as follows.
On one hand, children can be fulfilled by having many toys. Their parents buy these dolls or model cars to make them happy. When they grow up, they may recall their childhood full of satisfaction in that their demands were always met by their moms and dads. It is a good merit of having many toys. Besides, the children could broaden their visions since the toys are not created without backgrounds. Most of them originated from cartoons or movies, which means these children gained more informations from media. In this way, childrens' vision can be enlarged.
On the other hand, too many toys for children may be harmful to them, even their parents do not intend to do so. First, with lots of toys playing with, these children could not have much time to socialize with peers or adults. As we all konw how important the socializing skills are, which we need to be educated since childhood. However, some children are so addicted to play toys that they could not have a right way to communicate with people. Some of them even suffered from autism because they like to be alone. Moreover, having abundance of toys mars these childrens' ability to focus. According to the pediatric study, this mind distraction is adverse to the children, who may suffer more spiritual disease in the future wihtout treatments. Their concerntration could be easily distracted since when they are playing with toys, in that they have too many choices of them.
To conclude, there are both benefits and shortcomings that children having too many toys bought by parents.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, may, moreover, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84105960265 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45898775154 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562913907285 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4594474856 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.9473684211 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8947368421 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57894736842 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228609691628 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785364210719 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507575339348 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143677660044 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341519747496 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 50.2224549098 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, may, moreover, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84105960265 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45898775154 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562913907285 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4594474856 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.9473684211 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8947368421 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57894736842 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228609691628 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785364210719 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507575339348 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143677660044 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341519747496 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 50.2224549098 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.