Some parents think that advertisements are misleading for children, while advertisers claim that they provide knowledge. Discuss both view.
In today’s world, there is a public debate related to advertisements. Some parents believe that advertisements are misleading for children. However, advertisers share the view that they provide knowledge. Both of the views have their own merits which require careful consideration.
To begin with, some people are of the view that advertisements are confusing for children. The most frequent factor contributing to this view is the erroneous content regarding advertisements. To clarify, when seeing advertisements, children might not fully understand the figurative sense of these ads. Moreover, they are just curious to mimic the action as the advertisements showed. This is demonstrated by the following example. The advertisements in regard to Fami milk shows that after drinking a bottle of this band milk, a man is able to break the stone table only by using his hand without any tools. The reason to support this case is that consuming this bottle of milk helps him increase the amount of canxi in his bones, which allows him to own the vigour. After watching this advertisement, my brother always made an effort to do like this but was not able to succeed like his man did. For this reason, it is obvious that children are not able to understand the wholly content which the advertisements want to convey through an exaggeration story.
On the other hand, some advertisers argue that this advertisement supplies people with knowledge. To put it in another way, advertisements also provide necessary information for children. One example to support this view is that the advert for Colgate toothpaste tells children that they must brush their teeth twice daily to protect their teeth as well as their health. As a result, it is apparent that this information provided is good knowledge for children.
Take everything into consideration, we may draw a conclusion that advertisements have both negative and positive impact on children in some specific cases, which is the hiding message and the knowledge. However, I think that advertisements bring the plus sides to children rather than the minuses because of the knowledge they cater to.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rovided is good knowledge for children. Take everything into consideration, we m...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, i think, as a result, as well as, in regard to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20172910663 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03814471589 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547550432277 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9117094537 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2631578947 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36842105263 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39490206803 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140560966828 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127018148849 0.0667982634062 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281665498718 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902037497535 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.