Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s world, most countries show a great concern regarding space exploration. It is thought that the amount of money spent on developing technology for space exploration is unjustified. Nevertheless, there are more useful ways to spend this money. From my perspective, I am totally convinced by this statement.
To begin with, the most frequent factor to argue this statement is that space exploration is a waste of money. One example to demonstrate this view is that according to Euroconsult’s Government Space programs 2019 report, global government space budgets totalled $70.9 billion in 2018. Therefore, it is obvious that the amount of money being spent on space research is in the billions. However, this aspect of science has achieved extraordinary little except for a bit of improved technology which would probably have come about anyway by other means. As a result, investing in further developing technology is a waste of resources.
In addition, one explanation to support my point of view is that these days, there are many serious problems which need to be invested, especially healthcare system. In fact, the outbreak of the Coronavirus put the healthcare systems under the pressure with the large number of people infected with this kind of viruses. This is shown by the following example. CMS in the report illustrated that national healthcare spending of the US reached $4.01 trillion in 2020, which was more than the average among developed countries. Nonetheless, this country still holds the highest rank in the figure for people being positive with this type of virus. Hence, the amount of money spent on space exploration should be allocated for other important purposes.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that the money invested on the development of space exploration is unwarranted. Besides, there are more essential things that money could be put towards such as healthcare system. Consequently, I wholly agree with the claim brought up.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-06 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Vivi_peach | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
- The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 67
- With the development of technology and science some people believe that there is no great value of artists such as musicians and painters What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot Should we encourage the art area 61
- Some people think that secondary or high school students should be taught money management because it is an important life skill Do you agree or disagree with the statement 61
- In the past lectures were used as a way of teaching large numbers of students but now with the development of technology for education many people think there is no justification for attending lectures To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opi 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, besides, consequently, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, so, still, therefore, except for, in addition, in fact, kind of, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28301886792 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93957716007 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569182389937 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8196878183 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7777777778 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347197964494 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11592327174 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937556781463 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231333301837 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659649675349 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.