In recent years, there is an upward trend in robberies happening inside and outside the houses. People have a fear of being robbed on roads but the incidents are also occuring in the homes. I shall articulate the ensurities that people can make for their safety in the upcoming paragraphs.
On the one side, people are afraid regarding robberies that take place inside the houses. The foremost thing that people can make to secure their houses is installing the cctv cameras. If, the cameras have been installed in homes, these make the strangers aware and always keeping eyes on unknown people. To secure the money, some digital locks can be used with an alarm system. For instance, if, any robberer try to break in then alarms can make the member aware by making noise and loud sounds. This might be some good and useful steps that people can apply to secure their houses. Therefore, technology is suspicious and important measure that one can do for the safety of their residential areas.
On the other side, there are some other techniques that people are recommended to learn and can apply when they are in streets and on roads. In countries like Japan, authorities allow the students to learn the techniques and skills of self defence and martial arts. As, this is necessary for everyone to defend themselves from enemies. While, moving on roads and streets if, any robberer try to snatch Thier money or chain then with these skills they defend or protect themselves. Hence, the manual techniques is useful for society.
In conclusion, it is true that with the help of people can ensure Thier houses by using digital lockers with an alarm system and can insert the cctv for safety whereas, some manual skills like self defence and martial arts are useful as well for the society's security.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84142394822 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30024476593 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511326860841 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3041604275 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257028751573 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873803972167 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529423203032 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158196027872 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514022200855 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.