The young are people who want to explore the experience. In the starting of their life, they don’t know to differentiate about the decision between true or false but the youngsters can learn their success as long as the parent lead them to be an individual who shapes their attitude, behavior, and character when they make some preference. However, there are some doubts among people whether the young shall choose their own decision or not.
To begin with, the place to learn about the mistake can be achieved at a young age. Many failure decisions might be created because the risk is low. For instance, sometimes the children don’t like to eat some vegetable because they just prefer to choose meat. Actually, this is the wrong decision and an adult shall give some advice if their decision will affect her/his body healthy. In addition, the freedom to decide will improve their feeling to governance their future in term about the high-risk option.
On the other hand, every freedom must be constrained to make the young to become more responsible and respect about their own choices. There are several explanations about why parent shall supervise their children selection. Firstly their supervision will prevent the negative effect. Secondly, too many mistakes will not good for children psychology so that this key role of parent to prohibit it.
In conclusion, the youngsters must be allowed to make their options because it will enhance their knowledge to feel about positive or negative effect about the decision but the parent shall be work to manage and minimize the failure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun failure seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many failures'.
Suggestion: Many failures
...mistake can be achieved at a young age. Many failure decisions might be created because the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0946969697 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48826158333 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7876823708 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.461538462 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249141319807 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937717045632 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571098873634 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164016485533 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05106282664 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.