Cycling has been known as an effective way to improve physical health and improve the risk of obesity. While some people believe that nothing can compare to the utility of this simple transportation, some refute this notion. Both of these views will be discussed before my opinion is stated.
On the one hand, no one can deny the fact that cycling brings various benefits to people. Noticeably, bicycles are the most useful form of transport to combat against traffic gridlock as well as environmental damages, as many cities are suffering from traffic jam due to the increasing number of private cars or other modes of vehicles. Bicycles are tiny and need less space on the road, therefore, cycles could be the key tool curbing traffic congestion. Apart from that, it does not need gasoline, which means that cycles do not exhaust toxic fumes into the environment. So, not only does it reduce traffic jam, but also cycle does not cause meaningful pollution at the time of operation. In addition, Being a non-motorized transportation mode, the rider does not need to get a drivers’ license for it. The rider can ride on the bicycle at any time of the day and there are almost zero maintenance costs for the bicycle.
On the other hand, it is argued by many people that riding is uncomfortable for them. They allege that the small seat is unable to hold their body. Moreover, being a non-motorized vehicle, it requires more physical labor than expected. Besides, bicycles are not a good choice as a reliable mode of transport when the weather is adverse. For instance, bicycles do not have sheds and when it rains heavily, one cannot ride on it. They also argue on the point that biking can cause pain. Cyclists have to utilize their lower back in order to power and control the cycle. Consequently, back pain is common in cyclists.
In conclusion, it seems to me that on the whole the advantages of cycling on modern people are much weightier than the drawbacks based on a wide range of benefits they offer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 703, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n at the time of operation. In addition, Being a non-motorized transportation mod...
^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e physical labor than expected. Besides, bicycles are not a good choice as a reli...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77650429799 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61787016986 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587392550143 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9915000604 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7368421053 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.89473684211 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174748648562 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447163417544 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553447583587 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100534667639 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531499222238 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.