Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others. What types of old buildings should be preserved? Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages?
Some people think the preservation of certain old buildings should be prioritized more than others. In my opinion, although some types of buildings should be preserved because of their importance and impact, I believe that its disadvantages outweigh its advantages for several reasons.
Certain types of old buildings need to be protected due to their significant impact. The first type is the buildings that embody cultural and historical values because they represent a country’s identity and history development. The second type is the old buildings that represent unique architectural styles, which have the potential to attract tourists. A notable example of these buildings is the Imperial Citadel of Thang Long, a tourist attraction in Hanoi that holds significant historical values.
Preserving old buildings can have both advantages and disadvantages. Firstly, these buildings can be educational sources for students to learn about their country’s history since they were one of the remnants of the past. Secondly, these ancient attractions can positively contribute to a country’s economy since they are able to facilitate a rise in tourism revenues. Hoa Lo Prison Relic, for instance, is one of the most famous tourist attractions in Hanoi, attracting both foreign tourists and local students.
Despite the advantages of education and tourism development, their disadvantages matter more. First of all, the restoration of these buildings can be expensive, especially for developing countries. To renovate the old architecture without ruining the ancient appearance, contractors require suitable materials. However, these materials are often costly since they have become rare over time and might need to be imported from overseas, which is likely to exceed the estimated budget of some countries for maintaining old buildings. Moreover, rebuilding old buildings can affect urban aesthetics as it takes a long time to completely improve the damaged conditions. Once urban aesthetics are ruined, tourism cannot thrive due to visitors losing interest in places full of ongoing constructions.
In conclusion, old buildings that represent cultures, history and better an economy due to their revenues deserve to be restored. However, the drawbacks of cost and urban aesthetics outweigh the benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...historical values because they represent a country’s identity and history develop...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69942196532 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0451512232 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549132947977 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3494095678 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.555555556 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425679804206 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147759890526 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15633219028 0.0667982634062 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266819464289 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171345226091 0.056905535591 301% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.