Some people believe that competitive sports, both team and individual, have no place in the school curriculum. How far do you agree or disagree?
Although competitive physical activities have become a mainstay of the schools' educational programs, some people support the opinion that they do not have a role in school curriculums. I completely disagree with this statement, as I believe that such games are beneficial for students.
With regards to students, the impact that ambitious sports have had on each learner has clear advantages. Firstly, sports are vital for pupils, since they help students' health development and reduce the chances of obesity and getting heart related diseases. For instance, multiple studies have shown that by introducing more sports and exercises in schools, kids are less likely to develop health problems and will ensure that future generations will be healthier and will not have sanity problems. Moreover, students will undoubtedly become fitter and much more active if schools incorporate other sports classes and encourage learners to take up extracurricular sports activities. In addition, physical games also help in the fight against cancer and other lifestyle diseases.
Another point to consider is that by introducing physical games to students will also develop and improve a set of abilities, such as team working, leadership skills and team building, which will be extremely advantageous for future work places. For example, in sports, every player have to collaborate with their teammates to win. While they cooperate with their team members, players generate and sharpen team working, the ability to work as a team, as well as other valuable skills. This is exceptionally beneficial for them, since most corporations require someone with team working and leadership abilities. Furthermore, sports enhance pupils' social skills by offering a chance to encounter and interact with new people, as well as giving them an opportunity to visit foreign countries.
To sum up, I believe that competitive sports are utterly advantageous for students, as they help to tackle with various health problems, improving their vigor and strength, and, besides, help to develop and enhance a set of skills, which will be exceedingly valuable for prospective work places.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48348348348 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82994118767 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558558558559 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.4888155673 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.461538462 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166468287337 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635252279574 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554951143582 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120027991992 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740623762709 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.