Some people believe that confidence wins bigger games that knowledge alone cannot. Also, that accumulating knowledge makes no sense until one has the confidence to put it to use.
Is it true that knowledge will help one win a struggle only if it is put into practice with full confidence, or is it that confidence without knowledge is null and void?
It is often a dichotomy amongst people that whether knowledge is superior to confidence in winning big games or confidence itself is sufficient. From my perspective, knowledge coupled with confidence can assist in winning big games. This essay will discuss the reasons why knowledge and confidence both are essential to achieve success.
Firstly, knowledge is important in knowing the rules and regulations of any sports and without that, a sportsman can not play any game. In addition, knowledge can also help in understanding the technicalities of any particular sports. Thus, this proves that without knowledge it is arduous to win any game. To demonstrate, Cricket, which is a popular game worldwide, cannot be played without understanding the technique of playing it and therefore, all the top ranking batsmen are known for their techniques.
On the contrary, Confidence also plays a pivotal role in any sport because it boosts the player's energy from inside his body which outcomes as effective results. It is true that if any sportsman has extensive knowledge of the game, yet he will struggle in achieving goals since he's lacking with requisite confidence. For example, it is often seen that teams beating their opponents morally with their high confidence. Additionally, spectators usually praise those players who are highly confident as compared to those who just have knowledge of the game.
In conclusion, I opine that knowledge and confidence both are vital for winning big games. Needless to say that confidence without knowledge is null and void and cannot produce effective results, as far as winning big games is concerned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'players'' or 'player's'?
Suggestion: players'; player's
...role in any sport because it boosts the players energy from inside his body which outco...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 279, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he's
... will struggle in achieving goals since hes lacking with requisite confidence. For ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32442748092 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90817905056 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564885496183 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4736338458 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.307692308 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323515769675 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134694218691 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738516482601 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218239745385 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684426691127 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.