It has been a controversial debate about whether establishing new venues for the public, such as museums, town halls and sporting facilities is more essential than reconstructing and improving the current ones, or the opposite. This essay is going to describe two given sides and state personal view.
To begin with, it is advocated that the construction of new facilities in the public is more crucial than improvements of the existing buildings. It is likely because the advancement of technology and demands for changes have made everyone believe it is better to construct new buildings. The perfect example for this is with cutting- edge technology and state- of- the- art equipments, people are likely to go to sport facilities installed with those rather than the old ones. Another point is perhaps there is a need for constructing new buildings because those current ones are at risk of collapsing. If a town hall which has stood for several decades, it can be damaged or worn out by time; therefore, building a new one will be necessary.
However, several people are not consent with the stated opinion, they have a contrast view with it. There are numerous buildings which were constructed in the earlier periods, and later opened to the public. Hence, it is vital to conserve their landmarks. To illustrate this point, there are many historical museums in Vietnam have worn out but they are still kept and restored to their original appearances to remain their values. Additionally, constructing new public venues have exhorbitant prices and require a large amount of money and investment. If the government spends too much money on them, there will likely be bankruptcy in national banks, or worse, the state will be in debt which can result in higher tax rate and increased prices of merchandise.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that constructing new and improved public venues is needed to benefit the residents and society. However, I strongly believe that rennovating and restoring the current buildings are more important to save budget and keep the historical values of old buildings.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12173913043 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84955694718 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55652173913 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9595570678 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.8 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276279876462 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897108132823 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07643213552 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171975815072 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601719099411 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.