Nowadays some people think that public libraries are not necessary, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion and examples.
In this modernized era with the accelerated speed of technology development, people believe that it is unnecessary to construct public libraries, whereas several people oppose that idea. This essay is going to describe two given perspectives and state personal view.
On one hand, public libraries are thought by people to be redundant. It is likely because the presence of technology and the Internet has caused libraries to lose their sparks. People can search for what they want on the Internet and countless other online platforms, such as Wikipedia or Oxford Dictionary. Therefore, the number of people visiting community's libraries has reduced dramatically. Another point is travelling to a library can be time-consuming and exhausting. If a person desires to seek for an economy book, yet the nearest library is too far away, he will likely prefer to search information on the Internet.
On the other hand, advocates of libraries have a contrasting view. Although the Internet allows users easy-access and countless information sources in a nick of time, libraries' knowledge and books are far more reliable. These days, there are self-appointed experts and professors upload different information in several fields, yet they have not been proven to be accurate. In libraries, almost every piece of data contained in the books of those places is trustworthy and factual. In addition, libraries provide a peaceful and quiet atmosphere which can be beneficial. University students need silence to concentrating on writing their dissertations, entrepreneurs demand quietness to finish their business assignments. Only libraries can reply to those demands.
In conclusion, despite how technology has developed and has granted humans opportunities to get access to information quickly, I believe strongly that public libraries are essential to the ones who look for reliable contents and the tranquility libraries have to offer.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, therefore, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55743243243 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11381489896 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601351351351 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9032885513 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8125 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151063349384 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554029190275 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456071802069 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913964357435 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233052552867 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.