Nowadays, the traffic congestion is increasing at a higher rate in every part of the world. In order to cope up with these complications, some people think that authorities used money for the construction of building trains and subway lines whereas others opine that wider roads are good in this case. In this essay, I will discuss both views as well my opinion in the upcoming paragraphs. I, however side with the former view.
There are various reasons why I believe that railways and subways are more beneficial for a long run. To begin with, trains are bigger than road transportation. So it is facilitating thousands of people at a same time. In this way, people like to opt these type of public transportation. As a result, the usage of private vehicles has decreased. For example, In Mumbai, local trains are facilitating more than a billion locals everyday to commute across the city. Moreover, trains and subway lines are outskirts from the city which makes the inner section of city free from a traffic jam.
On the other hand, there are certain reasons why other asserts suggested for the expansion of roads. Firstly, majority of people used roads. If roads are wider than jams would be lesser. Obviously, more and more private vehicles accommodate easily and also commute time would be reduce. Another point is that the cost on these roads is much lower as compared to public transportation. In addition, the rest of money can be used to improve the essential sectors of society such as health and educational department.
To sum up, I would like to say that traffic is not a big problem if we are taking some steps wisely. Government should spend money upon railway and subway lines for the protection of environment and the safety of individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 428, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...facilitating more than a billion locals everyday to commute across the city. Moreover, t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...Firstly, majority of people used roads. If roads are wider than jams would be less...
^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...t the cost on these roads is much lower as compared to public transportation. In a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84105960265 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69924221084 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569536423841 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9082743314 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.9473684211 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8947368421 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15789473684 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312257233445 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715764081942 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537104425809 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175769540884 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076829280583 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.