Some people believe that government should spend money on new building rather than renovating existing building. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The governments use public money in many ways. Duties of governments such as reconstruction or building of new official places require substantial money which should be spent carefully. In my opinion, allocating funds on new buildings is a cost-effective way of management of government budget. More durable and comfortable new buildings may serve public best.
At first, constructing new building enable stronger home or offices,which contain contemporary steel and bricks, to last longer times. For example, in 1998 İstanbul earthquake, the most of the old building,some of them was revejunated previously, demolished at the first attack although many new buildings stayed erected. These apartments saved many people’s lives and fortunes. During natural diasters to avoid loss of money and protect citizens, the governments should new buildings.
Similarly, these accommodation centers serve more comfortable and modern places to voters who deserve it. For instance, British Art museum is a modern building with its spacious area which host many visitors all around the year. Many tourist easily reach the all facilities of the museum thanks to the modern construction of the building and eventually this return as more touristic income to the government. Artistic Official or private facilities creates opportunities for governments to get more revenue.
In conclusion, durable and modern official buildings are more life saving for governments. I belive that spending on new building is not unnecessary action. In future, its appear constructions will be designed more cost-effectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le new buildings may serve public best. At first, constructing new building enab...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...building enable stronger home or offices,which contain contemporary steel and bricks, ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , some
...earthquake, the most of the old building,some of them was revejunated previously, dem...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...During natural diasters to avoid loss of money and protect citizens, the governme...
^^
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es for governments to get more revenue. In conclusion, durable and modern offici...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, durable and modern official buildings are more life saving for governments. I ...
^^
Line 8, column 159, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
...new building is not unnecessary action. In future, its appear constructions will be desi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nnecessary action. In future, its appear constructions will be designed more cost...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, similarly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 238.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75630252101 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23726885058 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626050420168 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1096275503 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8666666667 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189345863754 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718269667586 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542635916569 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122313045506 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639221032702 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.83 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.