Some people believe that if the police force carries guns, it would encourage a higher level of violence in the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree？
In many places around the world it is commonplace for police officers to possess guns. Some people believe that police in the possession of weapons would level up the violent crimes in society. I disagree with this opinion because I believe that the
law-enforcement officers armed can be beneficial to the society in deterring criminals, controlling the crime situation and protecting themselves.
On the one hand, I would argue that armed police would bring negative impact on public security. To begin with, criminals might be also armed, they will fight against the police and protect themselves, which would increase the level of violence in the community. Furthermore, policemen are human beings, they might make mistakes by hurting ordinary people if the crime happens in public places. For example, when stopping an escaping criminal who poses a serious danger to the public, innocent people might be shot by accident.
On the other hand, I believe that police with guns will be beneficial to society. Firstly, armed police can act as a deterrent to the prospective offenders or habitual criminals. Secondly, police armed are able to arrest criminals or force them to surrender without physical violence. Finally, when policemen equipped with guns are involved in a dangerous condition and threaten by criminals, they are able to protect himself with a gun.
In conclusion, even though armed police officers can make negative impact on the public security, I strongly believe that they can make our society safer by carrying guns on duty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this opinion because I believe that the law-enforcement officers armed can be be...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26104417671 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70456807508 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55421686747 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.057248543 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.166666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20793962505 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855421630256 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760280858414 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113458916227 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.093808510255 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.