Some people believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment and only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
Nowadays, Improving the environment becomes most concern problem in the world. However, the contribution of governments and large companies are not enough to change current situations. In my opinion, individuals should join to make more differences.
It is necessary for everyone to share the mission of protecting the environment. For instance, while global warm happened, it will impact people over the world or pollution from a company can cause disease to residents living nearby. if only several groups from government care about that problem, it is even hard to keep the situation of the environment become worse.
The environment covers all perspectives. Hence, it seems pretty good if huge companies or government association with strong finance ability manage a project of improving environment. But we can not find too many such team or companies can deal with those missions. While everyone is under the effect of the environment, it is a better way to solve the issue is to call for people to enlarge their influence in protecting the environment. In 2004, Bill Gates raised funding support to rebuild the Amazon forest were disappeared by fire, the mission was much easier and faster while more people in Brazil came to plant new seeds.
Besides improving the current status, one of the important mission is to keep it in good condition in the long-term. What happens if official associations from governments and large companies start a project and then they totally forget it without any care. It is a fact that the environment will return the bad condition fast. Hence, to make environment better and better, all people should be joined and share the responsibility. In Vietnam 3 years ago, the government urges to change a river in capital Hanoi, they waste a huge amount of money, however, the situation cannot better because of garbage from resident and small factories near the river.
In conclusion, protecting and improving the environment is our responsibility, everyone can act together, not just several groups but small individual to cover all problem happened.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, Improving the environment beco...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould join to make more differences. It is necessary for everyone to share th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use disease to residents living nearby. if only several groups from government c...
^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...e disease to residents living nearby. if only several groups from government car...
^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uation of the environment become worse. The environment covers all perspectiv...
^^^^
Line 5, column 636, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople in Brazil came to plant new seeds. Besides improving the current status,...
^^^^
Line 7, column 481, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'changing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'urge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: changing
...etnam 3 years ago, the government urges to change a river in capital Hanoi, they waste a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 658, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent and small factories near the river. In conclusion, protecting and improving ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20118343195 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89292234339 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559171597633 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1097915522 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.411764706 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8823529412 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229399850097 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702714729038 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044252939559 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130382776966 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254746089327 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.