Some people believe that international sporting events are the ideal opportunity to show the world the qualities of the hosting nation. Others believe that these events are mainly a large unjustifiable expense.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Over the past few decades, the enthusiasm for governments to host significant sports events has surged dramatically. Many commentators argue that it is an ideal opportunity to demonstrate their cultural heritage and economic power during the events, while others think governments should spend the budget on other industries. In this essay, I shall examine both of the above views can hold water according to the different situation of countries.
To begin with, it is not a waste of money for rich countries like the USA, Britain and Australia to show their national qualities by holding big sporting events. Due to the high level of development in these countries, governments possess a huge amount of money on events like the Olympics without seriously diminishing their national income. In addition, local residents can benefit from the facilities like stadiums and sportsground because normally those places are open to everyone after events.
On the other hand, it is actually a large financial burden for some developing countries to host a fantastic sporting event. This is because there are more areas, such as education, food safety, infrastructure, etc., need money from the government in these countries. Governments should put priority in improving the living qualities of people when they make the national budget because tax income is from people and should be spent for people. It is therefore clear that governments of poor countries would use their money more carefully and try not to waste on expensive events hosting.
In conclusion, every country has a different condition and the government should take into considerations when they make a decision.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38867924528 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89009306934 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607547169811 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4030220931 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.818181818 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165269097864 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648619716306 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582552634314 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890163479215 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555265963236 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.