Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
Recently, the phenomenon of people’s reactions about bad situations and its corresponding impacts have sparked a philosophical dispute. In this regard, whereas some people are of the opinion that they should accept such bad situations as low income or job dissatisfaction, others believe that trying to improve these situations is far better. In my view, mankind should attempt to promote bad situations into more convenient conditions.
Obviously, struggling with such situations as the lack of money or tolerating poor conditions in workplace, eventually leads to miscellaneous psychological issues. For example, nagging about long work hours ends up different levels of stress. Generally speaking, to avoid psychological problems, we should make efforts to enhance improper situations rather than giving up.
What’s more, groundbreaking progresses along the history stem from the fact that a few prodigies always didn’t content their situations. As a tangible example, loads of people dissatisfied from long-hauling trips by horses in not far distant past, hence a few of them came up with novel solutions, like invention of cars.
However, other people, particularly religious ones, state that the unpleasable circumstances which they face with them in their entire life, are their destiny. On the other words, it is written for them to suffer bad situations, so these kinds of difficulties elevate their spirits to much higher levels of morality.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to support the idea that the merits of doing our best to enhance current bad situations instead of accepting them far outweigh its downsides. Imagine, all people around the four corners of the globe raise a white flag before bad situations, so are mankind capable of gaining breathtaking achievements or can they shed light on the darkest spots of science?
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, whereas, for example, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44863013699 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04130221132 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667808219178 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0395304013 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.583333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289002978 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953192965185 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119386243062 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137301097015 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133372538808 0.056905535591 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.