Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
The statement puts forward two school of thought, first which states that one should accept the failure and consider it as fate whereas the second argues one should try no matter the outcome of the situation. This issue is contentious one and can be resolved by scrutiny of facts. My opinions are described below.
For the first case, where one considers an unfavourable situation as fate and accepts it might do so based on his consequences. For instance, a boy aims for high marks in exam but fails to score the desired marks due to his health problems during his exam, might have to accept the score and move on with his life. In this case, falling ill during the exam was not his in his hand and he cannot do much about it. So, in this instance he should accept his score.
On the other hand, for the second school of thought considering the same example. But this time the boy is unwilling to study and scores less marks, this can’t be fate. This is his own negligence and has landed him in this situation. The boy should work hard towards the next exam to score higher marks and improve his situation.
To sum it up, one should not waste time and energy on things which is not in one’s control like falling ill in the above example. On the other hand, determination and hard work depends on the person. Every unsatisfactory situation can be improved with hard work and determination. I believe in the saying: “Hard work is the key to success”.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun marks is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...he boy is unwilling to study and scores less marks, this can’t be fate. This is his ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, whereas, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56439393939 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4432699068 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534090909091 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0772414938 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3333333333 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0821776840828 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340357461519 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367463072133 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0525439732855 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209249977881 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 12.4159519038 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.