While a number of people claim that free sharing data in scientific research, business and the academic field is suitable, others agree that some information is too precious to be forgiven. In my view, the second group has more logical reason for the claim.
A group of people state that free access to every kinds of information is an appropriate idea. Firstly, scientific progress depends on available data from previous experiences and discoveries. Because, scholars use recent information and become familiar with new obstacles easily without wasting time for finding them again. This result in booming the speed of evolution in scientific researches. Secondly, everyone in different parts of the world profits from information. For instance, while some universities in undeveloped countries have not any suitable facilities for academic researches, they find a chance to become updated with new advancements and enhance their knowledge levels.
However, another group of people are of the opinion that valuable data should not be available for everyone. I agree with this idea. The most important concern is related to the possibility of misusing this information which cause to serious disastrous. Therefore, restricting them reduce the risk of their unethical applications. Moreover, different countries have been spending huge investment on knew scientific studies in order to achieve novel advancements in different fields. These achievements increase their share in today’s world market where countries have a tough competition. Consequently, sharing these profitable data means to waste countries capitals. For example, Amazon website progress during years based on its successful business approaches and it is not reasonable to reveal these precious data for its competitors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: KNEW_NEW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'new'?
Suggestion: new
...s have been spending huge investment on knew scientific studies in order to achieve ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7276119403 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99005880538 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615671641791 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5147770659 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9375 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234511876717 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667199508402 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08349398998 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181134044901 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888052223052 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.