Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
As technology is expanding at an unprecedented level, it is becoming easier to provide and access the information. In regard of scientific research, business and the academic world some people believe it is desirable to share information, while for others it is too significant and valuable to share their details freely. Despite it is beneficial to share information in all these fields, some information is far more important to be accessed.
To embark upon, by providing as much details as required it is more convenient to pursue career in business, academic world and scientific reasearch. Knowing the information regarding a particular disease sufferer, it becomes easier for scientists to perform the research. As an example, studies have shown that research on a disease with full blown medical history patients were more successful. By sharing the desirable details good outcomes in the fields like scientific research, business and academic world are noted.
On the other hand, excess of anything can be hazardous even if it is in terms of information. Sharing every bit of detail regarding particular business or reasearch sometimes proved out to be detrimental. To illustrate, nowadays news channels are flooded with news showing many business tycoons and researchers have their ideas stolen through the information provided by them beforehand. Sharing too important and valuable information thus can be preposterous.
To reciprocate, scientific research, business and academic world are the fields which nowadays are prioritized by many people to build their career. Some believe to share each and every detail while for others it is still inappropriate to provide important information in these fields. In my opinion, valuable and chief information should be kept confidential.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is import 67
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. 61
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is import 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ed. To embark upon, by providing as much details as required it is more convenie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, still, thus, while, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52536231884 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06269596847 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6574547834 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.928571429 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470544443356 0.244688304435 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160843937747 0.084324248473 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129085988664 0.0667982634062 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309230736159 0.151304729494 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1064452421 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.