Some people believe it is a good job to distribute the new information about a scientific investigation, commercial sector and an academic world. Whilts others disagree and argued that it is worthless for someone hard labour and time.This essay will discuss both points of view.
On the one hand, it is a gigantic gift for a ordinary people to transformation of their life. Moreover new investigation and research helps them to reduced the conventional style and to applied the a new method. It may made worthwhile for anyone to be successful and ahead their life in better way. For instance, Alibaba is a prime example for that, Alibaba is the one famous company of world greatest person Jackma of the China. It always devotes to findout the a new technique of a business. Eventhough it is helping to the millions of youngster in all over the world to draw the commercial works by sharing their valuable method and a suggestion.
However, many disagree and feel that it would be worthless of someone' s effort and time. Although that have earned the unlimited stamina and a time to investigate on these thing, that is why by the freely distribute in a mass, they wouldn't be got chance to return their invested amount of money, and they might be faced the economic problems. For example scientist spends their longer time and power to find out something, if this creation might be arranged in market freely, their effort and time would be veinless.
To sum up, new information is made always precious gift for a ordinary people to draw their life in different way, however, I think that may be meaningless for someone effort and time due to the free distribution of their creation in market.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...thless for someone hard labour and time.This essay will discuss both points of view....
^^^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...the one hand, it is a gigantic gift for a ordinary people to transformation of th...
^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...people to transformation of their life. Moreover new investigation and research helps th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...d the conventional style and to applied the a new method. It may made worthwhile for ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...the China. It always devotes to findout the a new technique of a business. Eventhough...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this thing' or 'these things'?
Suggestion: this thing; these things
...ed stamina and a time to investigate on these thing, that is why by the freely distribute i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...y the freely distribute in a mass, they wouldnt be got chance to return their invested ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ested amount of money, and they might be faced the economic problems. For example...
^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...mation is made always precious gift for a ordinary people to draw their life in d...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82935153584 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72973541987 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535836177474 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9987207459 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.916666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166463368365 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612501886276 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737401117793 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114545890336 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914130379811 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.