Having access to information about different aspects is a crucial issue. Some opine that all the information must be shared among the whole globe, while there are some opponents who argue that data of some kind is so prominent that it can not be accessed to all the public. I shall discuss both the views before reaching to conclusion.
Sharing knowledge in the field of studies can be beneficial for all the students. Although, all the lessons are written in various books but these all are penned down by highly educated teachers. Admittedly, if teachers would not provide any information to the learners then it would become very hard for students to do well in studies. Moreover, in the field of science, access to the new formulae is extremely important to create another versions of a particular invention. For instance, if information about the technique of making computer and mobilephone were not shared by the inventors then scientists could not be able to made the modern laptops and smartphones.
On the contrary, some proponents refute the idea of sharing all the data within public. According to them, some informations in the areas of science and business are highly confidential, if that would be shared freely then it will lead to catastrophic conditions. For example, the scientific formula of nuclear bombs will be very dangerous in the wrong hands. Similarly, in the business world, there is a lot of competition among companies or firms. Therefore, if someone leak their data to the rival companies, this situation will create loss to that particular industry.
To conclude, it is irrefutable that information is key to success. In my opinion, there should be approach to useful information for denizens but the confidential data related to science and business must be in safe hands only.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'leaks'.
Suggestion: leaks
...mpanies or firms. Therefore, if someone leak their data to the rival companies, this...
^^^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'approached'?
Suggestion: approached
...success. In my opinion, there should be approach to useful information for denizens but ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06666666667 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84240899395 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553333333333 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8491793558 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250371712038 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799275156347 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561465829849 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157712436363 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516677113622 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.