Some people think international cooperation has brought benefits to world environmental protection, while others believe more benefits have been brought to international business. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Presently, international cooperation is crucial issue because of increasing poverty, employment, global warming and problems of environment pollution. According to some people, cooperation among countries helps in the environment field, while there are some opponents who argue that it is a boon for the business purposes. Although, it curbs some environmental issues but in my opinion, this benefits more in the business world.

Mutual cooperation among nations is beneficial from the business point of view. With the help of this, many countries have been benefited, as when a developed country set up their industry in a developing nation then it becomes a source of revenue for that particular country. Furthermore, citizens get more chances of employment during the establishment of a new company. For instance, some countries had been opened their information technology industries and some goods production companies in China due to cheaper electricity and salary rates. Certainly, this is lifting up the economy of China.

On the other hand, international cooperation is conducive to tackle these major issues related to environment. For example, global warming, lack of fresh water, pollution. Since these are not the problems of only one or two countries. Therefore, campaigns at global level could teach human beings how every person should participate in the mission of environmental safety.

To conclude, no doubt that international cooperation is helpful in the measures of protection of environment. However, it is more significant for the growth in business, because of low employment and revenue percentage of the developing and underdeveloped countries.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
...ormation technology industries and some goods production companies in China due to ch...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cooperation is conducive to tackle these major issues related to environment. For...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, no doubt, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6442687747 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20009725047 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620553359684 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8767018323 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208536988482 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665058029459 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625783451335 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121746998794 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497023792541 0.056905535591 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.